By Mary Cukjati, CEO/Creative Director
Should I? Shouldn’t I?
It is with trepidation that I wade into the fetid swamp of
comments erupting from the new Colorado Springs visual and editorial identity.
The dread derives from three factors:
- My western Kansas Quaker upbringing: I’m more comfortable working hard and serving my clients in the background noise of the community than speaking out publicly. And finally,
- Comments on visual and editorial approaches to branding are entirely subjective often reflecting the individual’s bias more than anything. Does the uproar about the new Colorado Springs logo and tagline merit a comment?
Lesson Number One.
A logo, tagline and
selection of colors do not make a brand.
Place brands encompass everything from resident perceptions
to visitor experiences; from the way business is conducted to the tone and
voice of its institutions as well as the environment and quality of life.
Credibly, our City’s brand may even include the way we
mercilessly find fault with our private sector, nonprofit and governmental
entities. It’s our independent Western
spirit boiling up and a true sign that residents love living here: people can
be brutally honest about the things they love. In this case, residents are
conspicuously pointing out that the logo, tagline, and colors don’t represent
the Colorado Springs brand in their heart.
Branding is a long-term undertaking. The results take time,
patience and commitment. It does not work automatically — as we’ve learned
today. I hope the Mayor’s Branding Taskforce listens to the dialogue and
continues to work on the visual and editorial representation of the brand.
The controversy is just about graphics and words, not the
brand. Change the graphics and words until they represent the brand correctly.
The process isn’t over. Let’s keep going.
Lesson Number Two.
Branding cannot solve
internal problems in a company, nonprofit or government entity. Rebranding
happens once you get your act together.
When Cukjati answered the Mayor’s Branding Task Force
Request for Proposal (RFP) early last spring, we included the following
cautionary statement in the introduction to our response:
“…But it is a sensitive time to
undertake this process (branding the City).
With the City’s unemployment
rising to 10.2% in January, the agency and the Mayor’s Branding Task Force
(MBTF) must proceed with caution and constantly seek collaborative community
input and consensus, so residents — citizens from all walks of life don’t come
to believe:
“…that the
branding process is simply a tool to redirect attention away from actual
economic and social problems such as local unemployment, diminishing public
expenditure on key services and increasing social inequalities…”
—
Ashworth and
Kavaratzis, Towards Effective Place Brand
Management, 2010
To be brutally honest, I believe it was the wrong time to
consider branding our community. Citizens are still struggling with a poor
economy, one in five children lives in poverty and rapid change is occurring in
our institutions. The Chamber/EDC merger, new strong mayor system, Memorial
Health System controversy and new leadership in many community organizations
are symptoms of great structural change. You brand at a time of focus and
insight into your organization’s nature, abilities and limitations — at a time
of internal alignment — not during a time of change.
So, yes, I believe the Mayor’s Branding Taskforce jumped the
gun in taking on this challenge now, but I bet they have learned a lot about
our community’s nature, our abilities and yes, limitations. Limitations came
crashing down around everyone involved in the City brand process today. But it
doesn’t mean we stop. Again, branding is a long-term undertaking. Let’s keep
going. Work through the changes. Get focus. Gain understanding. We are just
beginning.
Now we have the community involved.
Coming Soon on my
Blog
Lesson Number Three.
Rebranding should
make you swallow hard. The process can be full of pitfalls. If it doesn't scare
you, you probably shouldn’t try it.
No comments:
Post a Comment